Anmar Faleh Alhogbani vs Ids Waterbolk Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W L L L W L L
Form
W L L L W L L L L LHead-To-Head: Alhogbani 1 - 0 Waterbolk
They have played 2 sets in total, with Alhogbani winning 2 and Waterbolk winning 0. The last match between Alhogbani and Waterbolk was at the M15 Bali, 26-08-2024, Q2 round, Hard with Anmar Faleh Alhogbani getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Anmar Faleh Alhogbani | 1 |
| Ids Waterbolk | 0 |
M15 Bali(26-08-2024)
6
3
6
2
| Alhogbani | Stats | Waterbolk |
|---|---|---|
| 38% (3-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-4) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 23 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 47% (45-51) | Career Total W/L | 19% (5-22) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Goffin VS Muller PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Zandschulp VS Struff PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Anmar Faleh Alhogbani
Player
Ids Waterbolk
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
72%
(
33 of
46)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:9:0 | Average Match Time | 1:9:0 |
| 74% (40/54) | 1st Serve % | 72% (33/46) |
| 73% (29/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (21/33) |
| 64% (9/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (6/13) |
| 50% (3/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/4) |
| 41% (19/46) | Return Points Win % | 30% (16/54) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Anmar Faleh Alhogbani Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-2 10-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefan Palosi
Player
Anmar Faleh Alhogbani
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
53
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ali Habib
Player
Anmar Faleh Alhogbani
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
47%
(
29 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anmar Faleh Alhogbani
Player
Nikita Ianin
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anmar Faleh Alhogbani
Player
Siddarth Madhavan
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Bonnaud
Player
Anmar Faleh Alhogbani
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pavlos Tsitsipas
Player
Anmar Faleh Alhogbani
56%
(
61 of
108)
1st Serve %
55%
(
79 of
143)
5
Aces
10
8
Double Faults
9
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
47 of
79)
38%
(
18 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
22%
(
5 of
23)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
39%
(
42 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
62 of
143)
128
Total Points Won
123
|
5-7 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ids Waterbolk Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 2-6 7-6(3) 12-10 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Octave Caillat
Player
Ids Waterbolk
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Russell Henderson
Player
Ids Waterbolk
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
39 of
78)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-2 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Linghao Zhang
Player
Ids Waterbolk
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve %
61%
(
17 of
28)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
4 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
39
Total Points Won
13
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 47% (45/51) | Win/Loss | 19% (5/22) |
| 48% (98/107) | Sets Win/Loss | 25% (16/47) |
| 51% (943/899) | Games Win/Loss | 40% (251/376) |
| 50% (37/37) | Hard Win/Loss | 27% (3/8) |
| 31% (4/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 11% (1/8) |
| 44% (4/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 14% (1/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 154 | Aces Total | 22 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 119 | Total Double Faults | 35 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 245.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 78.56 |
| 62% (1995/3216) | 1st Serve % | 59% (413/703) |
| 66% (1323/1995) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (265/413) |
| 47% (569/1221) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (118/290) |
| 42% (132/311) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (14/42) |
| 39% (1222/3095) | Return Points Win % | 31% (184/601) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25% (1/3) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (44/48) | Futures W/L | 19% (5/22) |
| 46% (43/93) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 19% (5/27) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 39% (7/18) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 35% (6/17) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (3/9) |
| 85% (48/41) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 38% (8/3) |
| 15% (48/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 63% (8/5) |
| 6% (47/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (19/2) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
